Dara Kaye Editorial
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog

November #TIHLU

12/17/2015

1 Comment

 
When one of my colleagues asked me to guest teach a class on editing in his course on narrative nonfiction writing at Georgetown University, I was flattered. And when he told me this "class" would be held at a bar, and I'd get one-on-one time with each student to go over their essays (which I'd marked up and returned ahead of time), I thought all classes should be taught this way.

I'm only sort of kidding. I spent two years teaching English, but in a much, much different setting--at a boarding high school for gifted math and science students in Gongju, South Korea. In the casual setting of the bar, I encouraged these (adult) students to ask questions, to press me on the reasons for any changes they didn't intuitively understand, and to talk about their writing choices.

One student, after hearing me cite the rule behind a particular common error, asked tentatively, "Is there anything you still have to look up when you're editing?"

I almost snorfed my lovely-yet-affordable Shiraz. "I look stuff up all the time!" I told her. "I have the Chicago Manual of Style Online and Merriam Webster set to open tabs when I start my browser."

The truth is that even the most experienced editors have to double-check stuff. Every writer and editor I know has at least a few bugaboos, rules or distinctions that somehow just seem less intuitive than the rest.

So in November, I started keeping track of what I had to look up--and publicly owning up to each one. Being a good proofreader or copyeditor isn't about knowing all of the rules cold; it's about figuring out where your blind spots are and filling in the gaps with expertise, either by consulting the right resources or training yourself to understand and remember something you've struggled with.

On Twitter, you can find the things I've had to look up recently under the hashtag #TIHLU, for Things I Had to Look Up. The first five are below--and you're welcome to Tweet your own!
​

Things I had to look up (#TIHTLU):
1. Whether "Millennial" (and other generation names) are capitalized.
(They're not.)#amediting

— Dara Kaye (@DaraKaye) November 2, 2015

Things I Had To Look Up (#TIHTLU) #2:
Whether "disgorged" can be used as an intransitive verb.
(It can be.)#amediting

— Dara Kaye (@DaraKaye) November 2, 2015

Things I Had To Look Up (#TIHTLU):
3. The definition of "cadged"
"To ask for or obtain something to which one is not strictly entitled."

— Dara Kaye (@DaraKaye) November 2, 2015

Things I Had To Look Up (#TIHTLU)
4. Whether "horse-drawn" (adj) is one word
(Trusty @MerriamWebster assures me it is not.)

— Dara Kaye (@DaraKaye) November 2, 2015

#TIHTLU Whether "mini" can stand on its own as an adj meaning "small in relation to others of the same kind."
(It can.)#amediting

— Dara Kaye (@DaraKaye) November 9, 2015
1 Comment

Common Copyediting Error #6: Commas with Dates

6/26/2015

0 Comments

 
Editing a proposal today, I spotted two instances of this one. 

When you write out a full date, you separate the elements with a comma like so:
On June 26, 2015, I wrote this blog post.
or
Tomorrow is Saturday, 27 June, 2015. 
(US style is usually written in month-day-year format; UK style is often day-month-year, but the comma rules are the same.)

When you cite just the month and year, you don't need a comma.

President Obama was born in August 1961.
In January 2009, he took the presidential oath of office.

People get this wrong all the time. I see a lot of errors like this:
*I visited her in September, 2012. 

0 Comments

Five Common Copyediting Errors of Professional Authors

6/19/2015

0 Comments

 

I work at a top nonfiction literary agency and have the privilege of working with some supremely talented writers, including PEN/Faulkner and Pulitzer Prize winners. Part of my job is to give their proposals a final once-over copyedit before sending them out to publishing houses.  

I have been here for three years, and have never seen an error-free manuscript.

For the last year or so, I've been keeping a running list of the most frequent errors I see these talented writers make. It's proof that even the most successful authors miss things in their own writing.

I always say that trying to copyedit your own writing is like trying to lick your own elbow--you can get close, but in the end, it's a lot more efficient to have someone else do it.  


Keep an eye out for these bugaboos in your own writing, and if you spy them, know you're in good company.

1.   Confusing Restrictive and Nonrestrictive Clauses.
Example Problem Sentence: "I took my wife Sandy to the park."
Explanation of problem: Does the author have more than one wife?  If so, then this sentence is fine. But if he's not a bigamist, then he owes Sandy an apology--and some commas around her name to prove she's his one and only. (Still confused? Check out Grammar Girl's in-depth explanation.)

2.   Hyphens with -ly Adverbs
Example: "The rapidly-expanding company had finally hit a wall."
Explanation: You don't need a hyphen between an -ly adverb and an adjective. It's unnecessary because the adverb ("rapidly") can only be modifying the adjective ("expanding"), so there's no need to use a hyphen to show what the adverb is modifying.
Use a hyphen with adverbs that can sometimes be used as adjectives, like "well," to avoid confusion: the well-dressed man is a man who is dressed well, rather than a man who is neither ill nor nude.

3.   Rogue Hyphens with Ages
Example:  "When she was sixteen-years old, Rita graduated as the valedictorian of her high school class."
Explanation: Even authors who usually understand how to use hyphens get tripped up by ages. Just like other adjectives, ages need a hyphen only when they come before the noun they're modifying, e.g., "Rita was a sixteen-year-old girl."  (The sort-of exception: you still need hyphens when the noun is implied but not explicitly written, as in "Rita was a sixteen-year-old.")  

Similarly, even authors who use hyphens correctly most of the time often trip over "[X]-year-old [noun]." 
For example: "He shipped out of Camp Lejeune with the other 18 year-old Marines."
 "Marines" is the noun being modified. Here, it's being modified by "year-old" --not "18-year-old". Unless the Marines are now recruiting toddlers, that was not the author's intended meaning.

4.   At Wits End
Example: "Isolated and scared, Pat was at his wits end."
If you are at the end of your wits, you are at your wits' end (or wit's end--both are acceptable). 

5.   Hyphens with compound adjectives
Example: "In 1980, the Supreme Court would overturn this by allowing a crude oil-eating bacterium to be patented."

If this author meant to write about an oil-eating bacteria with a penchant for lewd jokes, this is just fine. But if she meant to signify that the bacterium eats crude oil, we're in trouble.
That's because in the example sentence, there's just one hyphen, and it's connecting "oil" with "eating," not connecting the compound noun "crude oil" with "eating". It needs another hyphen to link everything up: "a crude-oil-eating bacterium".
For adjectives that include an unhyphenated/open compound noun, like "Pulitzer Prize–winning play", call in the big guns: the en dash.

0 Comments

    Archives

    November 2018
    September 2018
    June 2017
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    June 2015

    Categories

    All
    Ages
    Client Writing
    Commas
    Common Errors
    Compound Adjectives
    Dates
    Essays
    Hyphens
    -ly Adverbs
    Punctuation
    Restrictive/nonrestrictive
    Testimonial
    #TIHLU
    Why Hire An Editor
    Writing

    RSS Feed

Home

About

Contact

Copyright © 2015